228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15529471)
1. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes.
Waldman E
Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
Rosado M
New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Trespalacios MJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
King M
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents.
Dillon LM
Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
Cuva AJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
Katz GA
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives.
Cahn NR
Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
Kaplan S
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
Malo PE
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Excess embryos: is embryo adoption a new solution or a temporary fix?
Johnson ND
Brooklyn Law Rev; 2003; 68(3):853-83. PubMed ID: 15237519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent?
VanCannon K
Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
Pachman TS
Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
Ellis M
Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
Waldman EA
Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
Katz DA
Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
Robertson JA
Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
Muller RJ
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Halakhic approaches to the resolution of disputes concerning the disposition of preembryos.
Breitowitz YA
Tradition; 1996; 31(1):64-91. PubMed ID: 11654662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
