BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15529510)

  • 1. Screw-type implants used as anchorage for lingual orthodontic mechanics: a case of bimaxillary protrusion with second premolar extraction.
    Kawakami M; Miyawaki S; Noguchi H; Kirita T
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 15529510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Hong RK; Heo JM; Ha YK
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):129-41. PubMed ID: 15747828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion.
    Liu YH; Ding WH; Liu J; Li Q
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):687-95. PubMed ID: 19602104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correction of severe bimaxillary protrusion with first premolar extractions and total arch distalization with palatal anchorage plates.
    Kook YA; Park JH; Bayome M; Sa'aed NL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 26232840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical management in extraction cases using palatal implant for anchorage.
    Giancotti A; Greco M; Mampieri G; Arcuri C
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 15608343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction treatment using a palatal implant for anchorage.
    Giancotti A; Greco M; Docimo R; Arcuri C
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 14703333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement.
    Hedayati Z; Hashemi SM; Zamiri B; Fattahi HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):588-92. PubMed ID: 17524619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants.
    Park YC; Choi YJ; Choi NC; Lee JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 17418722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of palatal miniscrew anchorage and lingual multi-bracket appliances to enhance efficiency of molar scissors-bite correction.
    Tamamura N; Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yamashiro T
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 19413381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of the distal screw in the distal movement of maxillary molars.
    Cozzani M; Zallio F; Lombardo L; Gracco A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 21490999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of alveolar corticotomies in orthodontic anchorage management.
    Echchadi Mel M
    Int Orthod; 2014 Jun; 12(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 24813102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 20620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?
    Liou EJ; Pai BC; Lin JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 15224057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-enhanced tooth movement: indirect absolute anchorage.
    Celenza F
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 14703757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.