216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15529510)
1. Screw-type implants used as anchorage for lingual orthodontic mechanics: a case of bimaxillary protrusion with second premolar extraction.
Kawakami M; Miyawaki S; Noguchi H; Kirita T
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 15529510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment.
Hong RK; Heo JM; Ha YK
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):129-41. PubMed ID: 15747828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion.
Liu YH; Ding WH; Liu J; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):687-95. PubMed ID: 19602104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction of severe bimaxillary protrusion with first premolar extractions and total arch distalization with palatal anchorage plates.
Kook YA; Park JH; Bayome M; Sa'aed NL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 26232840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical management in extraction cases using palatal implant for anchorage.
Giancotti A; Greco M; Mampieri G; Arcuri C
J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 15608343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraction treatment using a palatal implant for anchorage.
Giancotti A; Greco M; Docimo R; Arcuri C
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 14703333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement.
Hedayati Z; Hashemi SM; Zamiri B; Fattahi HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):588-92. PubMed ID: 17524619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants.
Park YC; Choi YJ; Choi NC; Lee JS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 17418722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of palatal miniscrew anchorage and lingual multi-bracket appliances to enhance efficiency of molar scissors-bite correction.
Tamamura N; Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yamashiro T
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 19413381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of the distal screw in the distal movement of maxillary molars.
Cozzani M; Zallio F; Lombardo L; Gracco A
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 21490999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of alveolar corticotomies in orthodontic anchorage management.
Echchadi Mel M
Int Orthod; 2014 Jun; 12(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 24813102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 20620840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?
Liou EJ; Pai BC; Lin JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 15224057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-enhanced tooth movement: indirect absolute anchorage.
Celenza F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 14703757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]