These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15530985)

  • 1. A numerical investigation of the resonance of gas-filled microbubbles: resonance dependence on acoustic pressure amplitude.
    Macdonald CA; Sboros V; Gomatam J; Pye SD; Moran CM; Norman McDicken W
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Dec; 43(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15530985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
    Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear response to ultrasound of encapsulated microbubbles.
    Jiménez-Fernández J
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):784-93. PubMed ID: 22406132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bubble oscillation and inertial cavitation in viscoelastic fluids.
    Jiménez-Fernández J; Crespo A
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Aug; 43(8):643-51. PubMed ID: 15890380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of static pressure on acoustic energy radiated by cavitation bubbles in viscous liquids under ultrasound.
    Yasui K; Towata A; Tuziuti T; Kozuka T; Kato K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3233-42. PubMed ID: 22087995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Difference frequency and its harmonic emitted by microbubbles under dual frequency excitation.
    Chen S; Kinnick R; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e123-6. PubMed ID: 16930662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-transducer dual-frequency ultrasound generation to enhance acoustic cavitation.
    Liu HL; Hsieh CM
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2009 Mar; 16(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 18951828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound-induced dissolution of lipid-coated and uncoated gas bubbles.
    Cox DJ; Thomas JL
    Langmuir; 2010 Sep; 26(18):14774-81. PubMed ID: 20722377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of encapsulation elasticity on the stability of an encapsulated microbubble.
    Katiyar A; Sarkar K; Jain P
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Aug; 336(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 19524251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Tickner EG; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 17656011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 May; 58(5):981-93. PubMed ID: 21622054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dependence of optimal seed bubble size on pressure amplitude at therapeutic pressure levels.
    Carvell KJ; Bigelow TA
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Feb; 51(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 20656313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law.
    Tsiglifis K; Pelekasis NA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4059-70. PubMed ID: 18537358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal design and experimental investigation of surfactant encapsulated microbubbles.
    Zong Y; Wan M; Wang S; Zhang G
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e119-22. PubMed ID: 16859725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Dollet B; van der Meer SM; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1465-73. PubMed ID: 18450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear ultrasonic propagation in bubbly liquids: a numerical model.
    Vanhille C; Campos-Pozuelo C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 May; 34(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 18314254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.