These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15532448)

  • 1. [Non-invasive coronary angiography by multidetector spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
    Tron C; Dacher JN; Eltchaninoff H; Gerbaud E; Bertrand D; Cribier A
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2004 Sep; 53(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 15532448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography.
    Maintz D; Ozgun M; Hoffmeier A; Quante M; Fischbach R; Manning WJ; Heindel W; Botnar RM
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 17957510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina.
    Hacker M; Jakobs T; Hack N; Nikolaou K; Becker C; von Ziegler F; Knez A; König A; Klauss V; Reiser M; Hahn K; Tiling R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Jan; 34(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 16951954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenosis.
    Silva C; Cheng S; Lima JA
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2006 Feb; 54(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 16467741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.
    Gaspar T; Halon DA; Peled N
    Coron Artery Dis; 2006 Mar; 17(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16474228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computerized tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Spevack DM; Levsky JM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):288; author reply 288-9. PubMed ID: 17631223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Comparison with conventional x-ray angiography.
    Gaudio C; Tanzilli G; Vittore A; Arca M; Barillà F; Di Michele S; Minardi G; Fedele F; Lombardi M; Donato L
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2004; 8(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 15368796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography.
    Budoff MJ; Achenbach S; Duerinckx A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Dec; 42(11):1867-78. PubMed ID: 14662244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical value of 16-slice multi-detector CT compared to invasive coronary angiography.
    Aviram G; Finkelstein A; Herz I; Lessick J; Miller H; Graif M; Keren G
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16019611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses"?
    Burgstahler C; Schroeder S
    Heart; 2007 Nov; 93(11):1322-4. PubMed ID: 17933982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive coronary imaging: CT versus MR.
    van Ooijen PM; Dorgelo J; Oudkerk M
    Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12669228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Kefer J; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19808528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary artery disease cannot be reliably evaluated by 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography.
    Bartnes K; Sildnes T; Iqbal A; Dahl-Eriksen O; Trovik T; Steigen TK; Mortensen R; Mannsverk JT; Sørlie DG; Myrmel T
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2007 Jun; 41(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 17487766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
    Dewey M; Teige F; Schnapauff D; Laule M; Borges AC; Wernecke KD; Schink T; Baumann G; Rutsch W; Rogalla P; Taupitz M; Hamm B
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):407-15. PubMed ID: 16983128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.
    Ropers D; Rixe J; Anders K; Küttner A; Baum U; Bautz W; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 97(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 16442393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there an indication for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts?
    Dikkers R; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; Willems TP; Post WJ; Oudkerk M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 19478621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spiral multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: a current status report.
    De Feyter PJ; Meijboom WB; Weustink A; Van Mieghem C; Mollet NR; Vourvouri E; Nieman K; Cademartiri F
    Clin Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 30(9):437-42. PubMed ID: 17803209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Calcium Score on Agreement Between Multidetector Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
    de Agustín JA; Gómez de Diego JJ; Marcos-Alberca P; Mahía P; Rodrigo JL; Luaces M; Núñez-Gil IJ; Ferreiros J; Bustos A; Cabeza B; García-Fernández MÁ; Macaya C; Pérez de Isla L
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2018 Feb; 71(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 28528881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.