These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss. Ferguson SH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses. Koning R; Wouters J J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. Turner CW; Gantz BJ; Vidal C; Behrens A; Henry BA J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15101651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2050-62. PubMed ID: 8227747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Ferguson SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation]. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech. Krause JC; Braida LD J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3346-57. PubMed ID: 19425675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]