BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15532783)

  • 1. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan.
    Tu CH; Lee YC; Wang HP; Wu MS; Chiu HM; Lin JT
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1586-9. PubMed ID: 15532783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prolonged pH monitoring: Bravo capsule.
    Pandolfino JE; Kahrilas PJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Apr; 15(2):307-18. PubMed ID: 15722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bravo capsule placement in the gastric cardia: a novel method for analysis of proximal stomach acid environment.
    Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Aug; 100(8):1721-7. PubMed ID: 16086707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wireless pH testing as an adjunct to unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy: the safety and efficacy of transnasal telemetry capsule placement.
    Belafsky PC; Allen K; Castro-Del Rosario L; Roseman D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jul; 131(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 15243553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
    Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
    Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
    Pandolfino JE; Richter JE; Ours T; Guardino JM; Chapman J; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):740-9. PubMed ID: 12738450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
    Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
    Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BRAVO wireless 48 hour pH-metric system.
    Hess T; Hahn EG; Konturek PC
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jan; 15(1):RA17-21. PubMed ID: 19114981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?
    Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 17(6):378-81. PubMed ID: 18072019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wireless pH recording immediately above the squamocolumnar junction improves the diagnostic performance of esophageal pH studies.
    Wenner J; Hall M; Höglund P; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 103(12):2977-85. PubMed ID: 18786112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
    Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; Wetscher GJ; Davis DM; Achem SR; Seelig MH; O'Brien P; DeVault KR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):906-9. PubMed ID: 10763935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring.
    Hirano I
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():12-24. PubMed ID: 16483266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esophageal pH monitoring with the BRAVO capsule: experience in a single tertiary medical center.
    Cabrera J; Davis M; Horn D; Pfefferkorn M; Croffie JM
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2011 Oct; 53(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 21519281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
    Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.