These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15533977)

  • 41. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
    de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
    Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of digital image enhancement on the detection of vertical root fracture.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Pehlivan SY
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20089061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Dagenais ME; Clark BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An ex vivo comparative study of occlusal and proximal caries using terahertz and X-ray imaging.
    Kamburoğlu K; Karagöz B; Altan H; Özen D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180250. PubMed ID: 30379560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.
    Rathore S; Tyndall D; Wright J; Everett E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 22184471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of a laser fluorescence system and conventional methods.
    Burin C; Burin C; Loguercio AD; Grande RH; Reis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 16317971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
    Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.