128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534338)
1. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19124107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities.
Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G; Metz CE; Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):605-15. PubMed ID: 11450961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
Gallas BD; Brown DG
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
Abbey CK; Gallas BD; Boone JM; Niklason LT; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Samuelson FW
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 24594418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.
Meinel LA; Stolpen AH; Berbaum KS; Fajardo LL; Reinhardt JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 17154399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.
Lasko TA; Bhagwat JG; Zou KH; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 16198999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Determinants of observer variability in early diagnostic mammography--a ROC analysis].
Swart E; Robra BP; Dierks ML; Reinerth H; Frischbier HJ; Bahnsen J; Schreer I; Hoeffken W
Rofo; 1993 Aug; 159(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 8353267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indexes for three-class classification performance assessment--an empirical comparison.
Sampat MP; Patel AC; Wang Y; Gupta S; Kan CW; Bovik AC; Markey MK
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 19171528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.
Swaving M; van Houwelingen H; Ottes FP; Steerneman T
Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 8778532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
