789 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534341)
1. Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions?
Kee F; Owen T; Leathem R
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 15534341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study.
Kidger J; Murdoch J; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 19250362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): the role and perspective of nurses.
Todd V; Van Rosendaal G; Duregon K; Verhoef M
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Feb; 14(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15669927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.
Elkin EB; Kim SH; Casper ES; Kissane DW; Schrag D
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(33):5275-80. PubMed ID: 18024875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Loh A; Simon D; Wills CE; Kriston L; Niebling W; Härter M
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Aug; 67(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 17509808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The multidisciplinary colposcopy meeting: recommendations for future service provision and an analysis of clinical decision making.
Palmer JE; Wales K; Ellis K; Dudding N; Smith J; Tidy JA
BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1060-6. PubMed ID: 20604774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management.
Richman MB; Forman EH; Bayazit Y; Einstein DB; Resnick MI; Stovsky MD
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2310-8. PubMed ID: 16280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Patients in pre-dialysis: decision taking and free choice of treatment].
Sarrias Lorenz X; Bardón Otero E; Vila Paz ML
Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 3():119-22. PubMed ID: 19018749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Spine Team Assessment for chronic back pain disability. Part 2: team decision making and a preliminary outcome study.
Haig AJ; Geisser ME; Michel B; Theisen-Goodvich M; Yamakawa K; Buchholz R; Burke J; Lamphiear R; Legatski K; Smith C; Sacksteder J
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 28(17):1079-86. PubMed ID: 16950738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.
Choy ET; Chiu A; Butow P; Young J; Spillane A
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):178-89. PubMed ID: 17158048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tacit and encoded knowledge in the use of standardised outcome measures in multidisciplinary team decision making: a case study of in-patient neurorehabilitation.
Greenhalgh J; Flynn R; Long AF; Tyson S
Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jul; 67(1):183-94. PubMed ID: 18403078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of a web-based breast cancer predictive algorithm for adjuvant chemotherapeutic decision making in a multidisciplinary oncology center.
Epstein RJ; Leung TW; Mak J; Cheung PS
Cancer Invest; 2006; 24(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 16777688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical prognostic scoring system to aid decision-making in gastro-oesophageal cancer.
Deans DA; Wigmore SJ; de Beaux AC; Paterson-Brown S; Garden OJ; Fearon KC
Br J Surg; 2007 Dec; 94(12):1501-8. PubMed ID: 17703501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of an educational video on patient decision making in early breast cancer treatment.
Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Copeland LA; Goldfarb SL; Wren PA; Janz NK
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(6):589-98. PubMed ID: 17099197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.
Butow P; Harrison JD; Choy ET; Young JM; Spillane A; Evans A
Cancer; 2007 Nov; 110(9):1937-44. PubMed ID: 17823912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental health case conferences in primary care: content and treatment decision making.
Bell JS; Aslani P; McLachlan AJ; Whitehead P; Chen TF
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):86-103. PubMed ID: 17350559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer.
Alderman AK; Hawley ST; Waljee J; Mujahid M; Morrow M; Katz SJ
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 18157830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?
Kee F; Owen T; Leathem R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Apr; 61(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 17372290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the black box of a decision aid: what information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer?
Molenaar S; Sprangers M; Oort F; Rutgers E; Luiten E; Mulder J; van Meeteren M; de Haes H
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 16945498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
