BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534407)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.
    Kothe R; Rüther W; Schneider E; Linke B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1869-75. PubMed ID: 15534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
    Xu R; McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 21121745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Duff J; Hussain MM; Klocke N; Harris JA; Yandamuri SS; Bobinski L; Daniel RT; Bucklen BS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():72-78. PubMed ID: 29455101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.
    Ito Z; Higashino K; Kato S; Kim SS; Wong E; Yoshioka K; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22373932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Du JY; Aichmair A; Kueper J; Wright T; Lebl DR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 25478824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.
    Bozkus H; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Nottmeier EW; Sonntag VK; Papadopoulos SM; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):915-22. PubMed ID: 15834336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine.
    DalCanto RA; Lieberman I; Inceoglu S; Kayanja M; Ferrara L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):897-2. PubMed ID: 15834333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of an atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion cage with C1-C2 pedicle fixation.
    Li S; Ni B; Xie N; Wang M; Guo X; Zhang F; Wang J; Zhao W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):E624-32. PubMed ID: 20505567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
    Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
    Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
    Wilke HJ; Kaiser D; Volkheimer D; Hackenbroch C; Püschel K; Rauschmann M
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27405823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.
    Ludwig SC; Kramer DL; Balderston RA; Vaccaro AR; Foley KF; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(13):1655-67. PubMed ID: 10870141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
    Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
    McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.
    Elgafy H; Potluri T; Goel VK; Foster S; Faizan A; Kulkarni N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 20081561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.