228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534701)
1. Combined use of physicochemical data and small-molecule crystallographic contact propensities to predict interactions in protein binding sites.
Nissink JW; Taylor R
Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3238-49. PubMed ID: 15534701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SuperStar: comparison of CSD and PDB-based interaction fields as a basis for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
Boer DR; Kroon J; Cole JC; Smith B; Verdonk ML
J Mol Biol; 2001 Sep; 312(1):275-87. PubMed ID: 11545602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FlexX-Scan: fast, structure-based virtual screening.
Schellhammer I; Rarey M
Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(3):504-17. PubMed ID: 15382244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bridging Crystal Engineering and Drug Discovery by Utilizing Intermolecular Interactions and Molecular Shapes in Crystals.
Spackman PR; Yu LJ; Morton CJ; Parker MW; Bond CS; Spackman MA; Jayatilaka D; Thomas SP
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2019 Nov; 58(47):16780-16784. PubMed ID: 31385643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):1093-108. PubMed ID: 10369784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of protein binding surfaces using surface triplet propensities.
Mehio W; Kemp GJ; Taylor P; Walkinshaw MD
Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 26(20):2549-55. PubMed ID: 20819959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small molecule annotation for the Protein Data Bank.
Sen S; Young J; Berrisford JM; Chen M; Conroy MJ; Dutta S; Di Costanzo L; Gao G; Ghosh S; Hudson BP; Igarashi R; Kengaku Y; Liang Y; Peisach E; Persikova I; Mukhopadhyay A; Narayanan BC; Sahni G; Sato J; Sekharan M; Shao C; Tan L; Zhuravleva MA
Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014():bau116. PubMed ID: 25425036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
Shin JM; Cho DH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DRoP: Automated detection of conserved solvent-binding sites on proteins.
Kearney BM; Schwabe M; Marcus KC; Roberts DM; Dechene M; Swartz P; Mattos C
Proteins; 2020 Jan; 88(1):152-165. PubMed ID: 31294888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank.
Kellenberger E; Muller P; Schalon C; Bret G; Foata N; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):717-27. PubMed ID: 16563002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer simulation of protein-ligand interactions: challenges and applications.
Hassan SA; Gracia L; Vasudevan G; Steinbach PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2005; 305():451-92. PubMed ID: 15940011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polypharmacology rescored: protein-ligand interaction profiles for remote binding site similarity assessment.
Salentin S; Haupt VJ; Daminelli S; Schroeder M
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2014; 116(2-3):174-86. PubMed ID: 24923864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of small-molecule structures to complement protein-ligand crystal structures in drug discovery.
Groom CR; Cole JC
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):240-245. PubMed ID: 28291759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies.
García-Sosa AT
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1388-405. PubMed ID: 23662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-SITE: use of empirically derived atomic packing preferences to identify favourable interaction regions in the binding sites of proteins.
Laskowski RA; Thornton JM; Humblet C; Singh J
J Mol Biol; 1996 May; 259(1):175-201. PubMed ID: 8648645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.
Sarkhel S; Desiraju GR
Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 14696187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
Jones G; Willett P; Glen RC; Leach AR; Taylor R
J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
