These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534701)

  • 21. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure.
    Bordner AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18940825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conformer generation with OMEGA: algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database.
    Hawkins PC; Skillman AG; Warren GL; Ellingson BA; Stahl MT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):572-84. PubMed ID: 20235588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular determinants for ATP-binding in proteins: a data mining and quantum chemical analysis.
    Mao L; Wang Y; Liu Y; Hu X
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Feb; 336(3):787-807. PubMed ID: 15095988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms.
    Word JM; Lovell SC; LaBean TH; Taylor HC; Zalis ME; Presley BK; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jan; 285(4):1711-33. PubMed ID: 9917407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PLI: a web-based tool for the comparison of protein-ligand interactions observed on PDB structures.
    Gallina AM; Bisignano P; Bergamino M; Bordo D
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(3):395-7. PubMed ID: 23196990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterising non-covalent interactions with the Cambridge Structural Database.
    Lommerse JP; Taylor R
    J Enzyme Inhib; 1997 Feb; 11(4):223-43. PubMed ID: 9208367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The roles of contact residue disorder and domain composition in characterizing protein-ligand binding specificity and promiscuity.
    Tang Y; Sheng X; Stumpf MP
    Mol Biosyst; 2011 Dec; 7(12):3280-6. PubMed ID: 22002096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical approach for detecting nucleotide-binding sites on proteins.
    Saito M; Go M; Shirai T
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Feb; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 16403825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Setting up a large set of protein-ligand PDB complexes for the development and validation of knowledge-based docking algorithms.
    Diago LA; Morell P; Aguilera L; Moreno E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():310. PubMed ID: 17718923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactive and Versatile Navigation of Structural Databases.
    Korb O; Kuhn B; Hert J; Taylor N; Cole J; Groom C; Stahl M
    J Med Chem; 2016 May; 59(9):4257-66. PubMed ID: 26745458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Propensities of polar and aromatic amino acids in noncanonical interactions: nonbonded contacts analysis of protein-ligand complexes in crystal structures.
    Imai YN; Inoue Y; Yamamoto Y
    J Med Chem; 2007 Mar; 50(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 17315854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mapping the energetics of water-protein and water-ligand interactions with the "natural" HINT forcefield: predictive tools for characterizing the roles of water in biomolecules.
    Amadasi A; Spyrakis F; Cozzini P; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE; Mozzarelli A
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 358(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 16497327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anion-π interactions in supramolecular architectures.
    Chifotides HT; Dunbar KR
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Apr; 46(4):894-906. PubMed ID: 23477406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring protein-ligand recognition with Binding MOAD.
    Smith RD; Hu L; Falkner JA; Benson ML; Nerothin JP; Carlson HA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2006 May; 24(6):414-25. PubMed ID: 16168689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrinsic disorder in the Protein Data Bank.
    Le Gall T; Romero PR; Cortese MS; Uversky VN; Dunker AK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2007 Feb; 24(4):325-42. PubMed ID: 17206849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drug-like density: a method of quantifying the "bindability" of a protein target based on a very large set of pockets and drug-like ligands from the Protein Data Bank.
    Sheridan RP; Maiorov VN; Holloway MK; Cornell WD; Gao YD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20977231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.