These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15534886)

  • 1. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial by Christopher J. Weir and Kennedy R. Lees, Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:705-726.
    McEntegart DJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3719-20; author reply 3720-1. PubMed ID: 15534886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic treatment allocation adjusting for prognostic factors for more than two treatments.
    Dror S; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1338-43. PubMed ID: 8589225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 18375460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regarding paper "Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance" by Lui K. J. and Chang K. C.
    Vach W
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):627-9; author reply 630-1. PubMed ID: 17722194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
    Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
    Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
    Moodie EE; Richardson TS; Stephens DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 17688497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A covariate adjusted two-stage allocation design for binary responses in randomized clinical trials.
    Bandyopadhyay U; Biswas A; Bhattacharya R
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4386-99. PubMed ID: 17348082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.
    Flyer PA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1551-9. PubMed ID: 9883551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the principal stratification approach to the Faenza randomized experiment on breast self-examination.
    Mattei A; Mealli F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):437-46. PubMed ID: 17688496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive allocation for binary outcomes using decreasingly informative priors.
    Sabo RT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):569-78. PubMed ID: 24697793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
    Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine.
    Campbell MJ; Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 17136746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgement post-stratification for designed experiments.
    Du J; MacEachern SN
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 17888038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.