125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15535542)
21. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study.
Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; Gibbs E; Chua SC
Midwifery; 2019 Feb; 69():10-16. PubMed ID: 30390462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring the quality of documented care given by Swedish midwives during birth.
Kvist LJ; Damiati N; Rosenqvist J; Sandin-Bojö AK
Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):e188-94. PubMed ID: 20833458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Midwifery care: development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth.
Sandin Bojö AK; Hall-Lord ML; Axelsson O; Udén G; Wilde Larsson B
J Clin Nurs; 2004 Jan; 13(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 14687296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of the process and outcomes of the first 1,000 births of a nurse-midwifery service.
Cavero CM; Fullerton JT; Bartlòme JA
J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 2037871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Successes and Challenges of Interprofessional Physiologic Birth and Obstetric Emergency Simulations in a Nurse-Midwifery Education Program.
Shaw-Battista J; Belew C; Anderson D; van Schaik S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 26624963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Swedish midwives' rating of risks during labour progress and their attitudes toward performing intrapartum interventions: a web-based survey.
Wiklund I; Wallin J; Vikström M; Ransjö-Arvidson AB
Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):E456-60. PubMed ID: 21820774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Moving audit into midwifery practice.
Dickinson V
Pract Midwife; 1998; 1(7-8):14-8. PubMed ID: 10392140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Nurse-midwifery services in one multi-ethnic, underserved community.
Fullerton JT; Palinkas L; Cavero C
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1991; 2(2):293-306. PubMed ID: 1777541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A cross-sectional survey of policies guiding second stage labor in urban Japanese hospitals, clinics and midwifery birth centers.
Baba K; Kataoka Y; Nakayama K; Yaju Y; Horiuchi S; Eto H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26911667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Women's Health Care Minimum Data Set: pilot test and validation for use in clinical practice.
Farley CL; Tharpe N; Miller L; Ruxer DJ
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 17081941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The costs and benefits of nurse-midwifery education: model and application.
Fagerlund K; Germano E
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):341-350. PubMed ID: 19720334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a midwifery initiated oral health-dental service program to improve oral health and birth outcomes for pregnant women: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
George A; Dahlen HG; Blinkhorn A; Ajwani S; Bhole S; Ellis S; Yeo A; Elcombe E; Johnson M
Int J Nurs Stud; 2018 Jun; 82():49-57. PubMed ID: 29605753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intrapartum referral from primary to secondary care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study on management of labor and outcomes.
Perdok H; Jans S; Verhoeven C; van Dillen J; Mol BW; de Jonge A
Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 25846937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.
Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S
Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Core Competencies for Basic Midwifery Practice adopted by the American College of Nurse-Midwives. May 2002.
American College of Nurse-Midwives, Washington, DC
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2002; 47(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 12361357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Marion's message. Support nurse-midwives.
McLean MT
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (69):7. PubMed ID: 15124310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nurse-midwifery in a large teaching hospital.
Platt LD; Angelini DJ; Paul RH; Quilligan EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 66(6):816-20. PubMed ID: 4069482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
