These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15536266)

  • 1. Detecting assumption violations in mixed-model analysis of variance.
    Chiarotti F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2004; 40(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 15536266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of repeated-measures analysis of variance and hierarchical linear model in nursing research.
    Shin JH
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19448525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A note on ANOVA assumptions and robust analysis for a cross-over study.
    Chen X; Zhao PL; Zhang J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1377-86. PubMed ID: 12185891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidelines for statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered data.
    Jones M; Onslow M; Packman A; Gebski V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 16908881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing efficiency and precision of data analysis: multivariate vs. univariate statistical techniques.
    Goodwin LD
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 6564529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical considerations for cross-sectional data relating to tracheal reconstruction over time.
    Preisser JS; Koch GG; Shockley WW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1993 Sep; 3(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 8220402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1349-61. PubMed ID: 17054536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of variance is easily misapplied in the analysis of randomized trials: a critique and discussion of alternative statistical approaches.
    Vickers AJ
    Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 16046383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An introduction to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with special reference to data from clinical experiments in optometry.
    Armstrong RA; Slade SV; Eperjesi F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 10897345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics.
    Jung J; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):652-65. PubMed ID: 16917920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Proper handling of correlated data in rehabilitation research].
    Kuss O; Watzke S
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Dec; 44(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 16320181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages of mixed effects models over traditional ANOVA models in developmental studies: a worked example in a mouse model of fetal alcohol syndrome.
    Wainwright PE; Leatherdale ST; Dubin JA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2007 Nov; 49(7):664-74. PubMed ID: 17943976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A generalized rank-order method for nonparametric analysis of data from exercise science: a tutorial.
    Thomas JR; Nelson JK; Thomas KT
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1999 Mar; 70(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 10100331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models.
    Rosopa PJ; Schaffer MM; Schroeder AN
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):335-51. PubMed ID: 24015776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new efficient statistical test for detecting variability in the gene expression data.
    Mathur S; Dolo S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 17698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.