These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15536305)
21. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers. Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spatial asymmetries ("pseudoneglect") in free visual exploration-modulation of age and relationship to line bisection. Chiffi K; Diana L; Hartmann M; Cazzoli D; Bassetti CL; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK Exp Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 239(9):2693-2700. PubMed ID: 34218299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks. Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. McCourt ME Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals. Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Silvanto J; Tinti C; Vecchi T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 21287314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect. Mitchell AG; Kandt PO; McIntosh RD Laterality; 2022 Jul; 27(4):443-466. PubMed ID: 35940957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-related changes in the allocation of spatially directed focal attention. Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Michałowski J; Harciarek M Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):748-764. PubMed ID: 31610738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum? Ribolsi M; Di Lorenzo G; Lisi G; Niolu C; Siracusano A Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25377236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. McCourt ME; Olafson C Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task. Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Presenting a battery for assessing spatial neglect. Norms and effects of age, educational level, sex, hand and laterality]. Rousseaux M; Beis JM; Pradat-Diehl P; Martin Y; Bartolomeo P; Bernati T; Chokron S; Leclercq M; Louis-Dreyfus A; Marchal F; Perennou D; Prairial C; Rode G; Samuel C; Sieroff E; Wiart L; Azouvi P Rev Neurol (Paris); 2001 Nov; 157(11 Pt 1):1385-400. PubMed ID: 11924007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect. Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults. Learmonth G; Papadatou-Pastou M Neuropsychol Rev; 2022 Jun; 32(2):438-457. PubMed ID: 33890188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm. Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ipsilesional versus contralesional neglect depends on attentional demands. Na DL; Adair JC; Choi SH; Seo DW; Kang Y; Heilman KM Cortex; 2000 Sep; 36(4):455-67. PubMed ID: 11059449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Line bisection task performance and resting EEG alpha power. Ciçek M; Nalçaci E; Kalaycioglu C Int J Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 113(6):849-66. PubMed ID: 12775348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pseudoneglect and the cross-over effect. Rueckert L; Deravanesian A; Baboorian D; Lacalamita A; Repplinger M Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 11640939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Line quadrisection errors in normal subjects. Son Y; Na DL; Kwon HM; Kang Y; Adair JC; Heilman KM Cortex; 2001 Dec; 37(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 11804215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A disassociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia. Ashkenazi S; Henik A Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2861-8. PubMed ID: 20594996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]