268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15536738)
21. Meet the enemy: he is us.
Nash DB
Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(1 Suppl):4S. PubMed ID: 21217017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What's next for patient safety: an interview with the Institute of Medicine's Kenneth I. Shine, MD.. Interview by Therese Droste.
Shine KI
Healthplan; 2000; 41(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 10977686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System in 1999.
Stefl ME
Front Health Serv Manage; 2001; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11589119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Keeping patients safe.
Sarudi D
Hosp Health Netw; 2001 Apr; 75(4):42-6. PubMed ID: 11330137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Revisiting medical error: five years after the IOM report, have reporting systems made a measurable difference?
Harrington MM
Health Matrix Clevel; 2005; 15(2):329-82. PubMed ID: 16238287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Keeping the emphasis on safety. IOM statistics on number of medical errors 'misleading,' JAMA report says.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jul; 31(31):16. PubMed ID: 11508137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality, performance measures make haste, slowly.
Gatty B
RN; 2006 Mar; 69(3):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 16579154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Dueling priorities.
Scalise D
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Nov; 76(11):42-4, 2. PubMed ID: 12465586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. IT, patient safety, and quality care.
Ball MJ; Douglas JV
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 11813520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient safety: mindful, meaningful, and fulfilling.
Winokur SC; Beauregard KJ
Front Health Serv Manage; 2005; 22(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 16223102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient safety tools up. Construction of new policies, procedures, standards and systems is getting under way.
Monahan T
Healthc Inform; 2002 Mar; 19(3):28-32, 34. PubMed ID: 12827809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Mississippi nurses convene to address patient safety.
Miss RN; 2004; 66(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 15672760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality.
Brennan TA; Gawande A; Thomas E; Studdert D
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(13):1405-9. PubMed ID: 16192489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Why patient safety matters.
Alexander LM
JAAPA; 2006 Apr; 19(4):12, 59. PubMed ID: 16626100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical errors: five years after the IOM report.
Bleich S
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2005 Jul; (830):1-15. PubMed ID: 16193597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient safety initiatives following the IOM report.
Shalgian C
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2001 Jun; 86(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 17380693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical errors, airplanes, and information technology.
Simpson RL
Nurs Manage; 2000 Jun; 31(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 15127524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality vs. quantity. IOM report: hospitals must cut back workload and hours of nurses to maintain patient safety.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):8, 11. PubMed ID: 14666543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient safety: rejecting the status quo.
Levin AA
N C Med J; 2005; 66(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 15952457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of the patient-safety improvements since the IOM report: how the healthcare delivery system progressed and the challenges that remain.
Groszek J
Ann Health Law; 2010; 19(1 Spec No):85-9. PubMed ID: 21495553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
