BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15537014)

  • 1. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal.
    Ferrer J; Morenilla JJ; Bouzas A; García-Usach F
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):87-94. PubMed ID: 15536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Hvala N; Vrecko D; Burica O; Strazar M; Levstek M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):325-32. PubMed ID: 12361028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of heat recovery from raw wastewater on nitrification and nitrogen removal in activated sludge plants.
    Wanner O; Panagiotidis V; Clavadetscher P; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4725-34. PubMed ID: 16278004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs.
    Wichern M; Lübken M; Blömer R; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):211-8. PubMed ID: 12906292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the Activated Sludge Model no. 3.
    Wichern M; Obenaus F; Wulf P; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11496677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nitrogen removal from sludge water with SBR process: start-up of a full-scale plant in the municipal wastewater treatment plant at Ingolstadt, Germany.
    Vallés-Morales MJ; Mendoza-Roca JA; Bes-Piá A; Iborra-Clar A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):51-8. PubMed ID: 15656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced nitrogen removal in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A; Tardy GM; Literáthy B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):1-8. PubMed ID: 15553452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrofitting activated sludge systems to intermittent aeration for nitrogen removal.
    Hanhan O; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(8):75-82. PubMed ID: 12420968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
    Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic modelling of nitrification in an aerated facultative lagoon.
    Houweling D; Kharoune L; Escalas A; Comeau Y
    Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17689585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequencing batch reactor treatment of tannery wastewater for carbon and nitrogen removal.
    Murat S; Ateş Gencell E; Taşli R; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):219-27. PubMed ID: 12448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences with a large-size WWTP based on activated sludge-biofiltration processes: 25 months of operation.
    Licskó I; Szabó GC; Melicz Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):285-93. PubMed ID: 15537018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nutrients removal in MBRs for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Kraume M; Bracklow U; Vocks M; Drews A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):391-402. PubMed ID: 16004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Savings with upgraded performance through improved activated sludge denitrification in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A; Tardy GM; Palkó G; Benáková A; Krhutková O; Wanner J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(8):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18469403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from alkaline fermentation liquid of waste activated sludge and application of the fermentation liquid to promote biological municipal wastewater treatment.
    Tong J; Chen Y
    Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(12):2969-76. PubMed ID: 19443007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
    Sarioglu M; Insel G; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge during the simulation of wastewater treatment plants using a risk assessment model.
    Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Gernaey KV; Rosen C
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4527-38. PubMed ID: 19695661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of a 2-year investigation on enhanced biological nutrients removal and trace organics elimination in membrane bioreactor (MBR).
    Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Buisson H; Keller S; Tazi-Pain A; Luck F
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):453-60. PubMed ID: 16459821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.