These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15538241)

  • 21. Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Jeon HG; Bae J; Yi JS; Hwang IS; Lee SE; Lee E
    Int J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):682-6. PubMed ID: 19602004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence.
    Poulos CK; Koch MO; Eble JN; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15378493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parameters of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens lack prognostic significance.
    Merrilees AD; Bethwaite PB; Russell GL; Robinson RG; Delahunt B
    Mod Pathol; 2008 Sep; 21(9):1095-100. PubMed ID: 18500264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases.
    Sebo TJ; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Myers RP; Blute ML; Zincke H
    Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2196-204. PubMed ID: 11391602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Maru N; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Aug; 32(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 11521227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation of perineural invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens with other pathologic prognostic factors and PSA failure.
    Ozcan F
    Eur Urol; 2001 Sep; 40(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 11684847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Value of perineural invasion in prostatectomy specimen in the assessment on tumor progression and prognosis].
    Zhu YJ; Wang YQ; Pan JH; Dong BJ; Xu F; Sha JJ; Xue W; Huang YR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 54(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 26932892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Microfocal prostate cancer: a clinicopathological analysis of 206 cases].
    Nie L; Chen XQ; Song YK; Zhang MN; Xu M; Gong J; Zhou Q; Chen N
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 51(7):634-639. PubMed ID: 35785834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Emerson RE; Koch MO; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 16189146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy: Prognostic value on radical prostatectomy and active surveillance.
    Ramos N; Macedo A; Rosa J; Carvalho M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Dec; 92(4):. PubMed ID: 33348961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
    Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
    Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson W; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Elashoff D; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2142-6. PubMed ID: 12771736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does the size matter?: Prostate weight does not predict PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Davidson DD; Koch MO; Lin H; Jones TD; Biermann K; Cheng L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Apr; 133(4):662-8. PubMed ID: 20231620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Side-specific factors associated with extracapsular extension and seminal vesicular invasion in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Sankin A; Tareen B; Lepor H
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2009; 12(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 19238170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prostate cancer is highly predictable: a prognostic equation based on all morphological variables in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Stamey TA; Yemoto CM; McNeal JE; Sigal BM; Johnstone IM
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10737486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor.
    Yossepowitch O; Sircar K; Scardino PT; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Reuter VE
    J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2011-5. PubMed ID: 12394697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.