165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15538553)
1. Growth rates of Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts hinder their ability to compete with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch corn mash fermentations.
Abbott DA; Hynes SH; Ingledew WM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Mar; 66(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 15538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of aeration strategy in fuel alcohol fermentations contaminated with Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts.
Abbott DA; Ingledew WM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Nov; 69(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15782293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaction effects of lactic acid and acetic acid at different temperatures on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.
Graves T; Narendranath NV; Dawson K; Power R
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 73(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 17058076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling of yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis growth at different acetic acid concentrations under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
Yahara GA; Javier MA; Tulio MJ; Javier GR; Guadalupe AU
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Nov; 30(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 17622565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation.
Bely M; Stoeckle P; Masneuf-Pomarède I; Dubourdieu D
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 18262301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production.
Abbott DA; Ingledew WM
Biotechnol Lett; 2004 Aug; 26(16):1313-6. PubMed ID: 15483392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cellular death of two non-Saccharomyces wine-related yeasts during mixed fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Pérez-Nevado F; Albergaria H; Hogg T; Girio F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 108(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 16564103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brettanomyces bruxellensis: effect of oxygen on growth and acetic acid production.
Aguilar Uscanga MG; Délia ML; Strehaiano P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 61(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 12655458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.
Graves T; Narendranath NV; Dawson K; Power R
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 33(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 16491359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relative glucose uptake abilities of non-Saccharomyces yeasts play a role in their coexistence with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in mixed cultures.
Nissen P; Nielsen D; Arneborg N
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 May; 64(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 14689245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dekkera and Brettanomyces growth and utilisation of hydroxycinnamic acids in synthetic media.
Harris V; Ford CM; Jiranek V; Grbin PR
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 78(6):997-1006. PubMed ID: 18322682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must.
Moreira N; Mendes F; Guedes de Pinho P; Hogg T; Vasconcelos I
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 124(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 18457893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model of the specific growth rate inhibition by weak acids in yeasts based on energy requirements.
Quintas C; Leyva JS; Sotoca R; Loureiro-Dias MC; Peinado JM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):125-30. PubMed ID: 15854698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of very high gravity ethanol fermentation of corn mash. Effect of glucoamylase dosage, pre-saccharification and yeast strain.
Devantier R; Pedersen S; Olsson L
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Sep; 68(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 15678305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement and analysis of intracellular ATP levels in metabolically engineered Zymomonas mobilis fermenting glucose and xylose mixtures.
Saez-Miranda JC; Saliceti-Piazza L; McMillan JD
Biotechnol Prog; 2006; 22(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 16599547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fermentative and growth performances of Dekkera bruxellensis in different batch systems and the effect of initial low cell counts in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Meneghin MC; Bassi AP; Codato CB; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Yeast; 2013 Aug; 30(8):295-305. PubMed ID: 23658026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physiological and oenological traits of different Dekkera/Brettanomyces bruxellensis strains under wine-model conditions.
Vigentini I; Romano A; Compagno C; Merico A; Molinari F; Tirelli A; Foschino R; Volonterio G
FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1087-96. PubMed ID: 18565109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of volatile acidity of wines by selected yeast strains.
Vilela-Moura A; Schuller D; Mendes-Faia A; Côrte-Real M
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 80(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 18677471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of wine yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) aldehyde dehydrogenases to acetaldehyde stress during Icewine fermentation.
Pigeau GM; Inglis DL
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 103(5):1576-86. PubMed ID: 17953569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations by ozone treatment of uncooked corn mash.
Rasmussen ML; Koziel JA; Jane JL; Pometto AL
J Agric Food Chem; 2015 Jun; 63(21):5239-48. PubMed ID: 25966035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
