These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15539728)

  • 1. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kramer A; Zygun D; Hawes H; Easton P; Ferland A
    Chest; 2004 Nov; 126(5):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15539728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
    Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
    Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
    Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison between systolic pressure variations under mechanical ventilation and classic pressure parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients after coronary surgery].
    Bubenek S; Giurgiuman L; Miclea I; Boros C; Iliescu V; Vasile R
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2006; 101(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 16927920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measured from a peripheral artery for accurately predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated dogs.
    Dalmagro TL; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Celeita-Rodríguez N; Garofalo NA; López-Castañeda B; Nascimento-Junior PD
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 48(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 34020897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
    Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
    Wyffels PA; Durnez PJ; Helderweirt J; Stockman WM; De Kegel D
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 17646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
    Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.
    Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement.
    Lansdorp B; Ouweneel D; de Keijzer A; van der Hoeven JG; Lemson J; Pickkers P
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Oct; 107(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 21700612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of augmented pulse pressure variation using the Valsalva manoeuvre as a predictor of fluid responsiveness under open-chest conditions: A prospective observational study.
    Min JJ; Kim TK; Lee JH; Park J; Cho HS; Kim WS; Lee YT
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 May; 34(5):254-261. PubMed ID: 28207430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemodynamic pressure waveform analysis in predicting fluid responsiveness.
    Roy S; Couture P; Qizilbash B; Toupin F; Levesque S; Carrier M; Lambert J; Denault AY
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 23849524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.