BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15540279)

  • 1. Biologically motivated computational modeling: contribution to risk assessment.
    Meek ME
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15540279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat.
    Conolly RB; Kimbell JS; Janszen D; Schlosser PM; Kalisak D; Preston J; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Oct; 75(2):432-47. PubMed ID: 12857938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose-response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset.
    Conolly RB; Kimbell JS; Janszen D; Schlosser PM; Kalisak D; Preston J; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 15254341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmark dose risk assessment for formaldehyde using airflow modeling and a single-compartment, DNA-protein cross-link dosimetry model to estimate human equivalent doses.
    Schlosser PM; Lilly PD; Conolly RB; Janszen DB; Kimbell JS
    Risk Anal; 2003 Jun; 23(3):473-87. PubMed ID: 12836840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity analysis of biologically motivated model for formaldehyde-induced respiratory cancer in humans.
    Crump KS; Chen C; Fox JF; Van Landingham C; Subramaniam R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):481-95. PubMed ID: 18628253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainties in the CIIT model for formaldehyde-induced carcinogenicity in the rat: a limited sensitivity analysis-I.
    Subramaniam RP; Crump KS; Van Landingham C; White P; Chen C; Schlosser PM
    Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1237-54. PubMed ID: 18076493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Characteristics of modifying effects of formaldehyde on carcinogenesis].
    Ianysheva NIa; Balenko NV; Chernichenko IA; Litvichenko ON; Sovertkova LS; Babiĭ VF
    Gig Sanit; 1998; (1):51-4. PubMed ID: 9560943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde vapor: interim findings in a long-term bioassay of rats and mice.
    Swenberg J; Kerns W; Pavkov K; Mitchell R; Gralla EJ
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1980; 8():283-6. PubMed ID: 7308029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of endogenous formaldehyde in nasal tissues on inhaled formaldehyde dosimetry predictions in the rat, monkey, and human nasal passages.
    Schroeter JD; Campbell J; Kimbell JS; Conolly RB; Clewell HJ; Andersen ME
    Toxicol Sci; 2014 Apr; 138(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 24385418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A brief review of formaldehyde carcinogenesis in relation to rat nasal pathology and human health risk assessment.
    Morgan KT
    Toxicol Pathol; 1997; 25(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 9210261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer risk assessment of direct acting carcinogens.
    Zito R
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 10606168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of nasal tumors in rats exposed to mixtures of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and formaldehyde (HCHO) by inhalation.
    Krimsky MM
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1986 Sep; 85(2):295-6. PubMed ID: 3764916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphology of nasal lesions in F344/N rats following chronic inhalation exposure to naphthalene vapors.
    Long PH; Herbert RA; Peckham JC; Grumbein SL; Shackelford CC; Abdo K
    Toxicol Pathol; 2003; 31(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 14585734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mechanistic toxicology of formaldehyde and its implications for quantitative risk estimation.
    Starr TB; Gibson JE
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 1985; 25():745-67. PubMed ID: 3890715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. N'-Nitrosonornicotine (NNN).
    IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum; 1985 Sep; 37():241-61. PubMed ID: 3866745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetry modeling of inhaled formaldehyde: comparisons of local flux predictions in the rat, monkey, and human nasal passages.
    Kimbell JS; Subramaniam RP; Gross EA; Schlosser PM; Morgan KT
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Nov; 64(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 11606806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity.
    Arts JH; Rennen MA; de Heer C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):144-60. PubMed ID: 16413643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An updated mode of action and human relevance framework evaluation for Formaldehyde-Related nasal tumors.
    Thompson CM; Gentry R; Fitch S; Lu K; Clewell HJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2020 Nov; 50(10):919-952. PubMed ID: 33599198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory irritation potential of selected nasal tumorigens in the rat.
    Gardner RJ; Burgess BA; Kennedy GL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Jan; 23(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 4038687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemically-induced nasal carcinogenesis and epithelial cell proliferation: a brief review.
    Monticello TM; Morgan KT
    Mutat Res; 1997 Oct; 380(1-2):33-41. PubMed ID: 9385388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.