BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15540285)

  • 1. Transverse coloplasty pouch after total mesorectal excision: functional assessment of evacuation.
    Köninger JS; Butters M; Redecke JD; Z'graggen K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Oct; 47(10):1586-93. PubMed ID: 15540285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evacuation of neorectal reservoirs after TME.
    Köninger JS; Butters M; Redecke JD; Z'graggen K
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2005; 165():180-90. PubMed ID: 15865032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch.
    Z'graggen K; Maurer CA; Birrer S; Giachino D; Kern B; Büchler MW
    Ann Surg; 2001 Dec; 234(6):780-5; discussion 785-7. PubMed ID: 11729384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.
    Fürst A; Burghofer K; Hutzel L; Jauch KW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 May; 45(5):660-7. PubMed ID: 12004217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transverse coloplasty pouch and colonic J-pouch for rectal cancer--a comparative study.
    Pimentel JM; Duarte A; Gregório C; Souto P; Patrício J
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 Sep; 5(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 12925082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study.
    Fürst A; Suttner S; Agha A; Beham A; Jauch KW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Sep; 46(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 12972958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taeniectomy Versus Transverse Coloplasty as Neorectum After Low Rectal Resection.
    Farag A; Mashhour AN; Elbarmelgi MY
    World J Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(4):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 30564920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.
    Mantyh CR; Hull TL; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11805561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The transverse coloplasty pouch. Review of experimental data and clinical application].
    Z'graggen K; Maurer CA; Büchler MW
    Zentralbl Chir; 2001; 126 Suppl 1():64-6. PubMed ID: 11819176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.
    Remzi FH; Fazio VW; Gorgun E; Zutshi M; Church JM; Lavery IC; Hull TL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 15785900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 5-cm colonic J pouch colo-anal reconstruction following anterior resection for low rectal cancer results in acceptable evacuation and continence in the long term.
    Amin AI; Hallböök O; Lee AJ; Sexton R; Moran BJ; Heald RJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 Jan; 5(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12780924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.
    Ho YH; Brown S; Heah SM; Tsang C; Seow-Choen F; Eu KW; Tang CL
    Ann Surg; 2002 Jul; 236(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 12131085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Selvindos PB; Ho YH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.
    Jiang JK; Yang SH; Lin JK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Nov; 48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. PubMed ID: 16132480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction.
    Otto S; Kroesen AJ; Hotz HG; Buhr HJ; Kruschewski M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 17520367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of functional and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colonic J-pouch versus straight reconstruction after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH; Huang KC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):1972-9. PubMed ID: 17431725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonic J-pouch as a neorectum: functional assessment.
    Chew SB; Tindal DS
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1997 Sep; 67(9):607-10. PubMed ID: 9322696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional results of the colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch in Heidelberg.
    Ulrich A; Z'graggen K; Weitz J; Büchler MW
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2005; 165():205-11. PubMed ID: 15865035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The transverse coloplasty pouch is technically easy and safe and improves functional outcomes after low rectal cancer resection-a single center experience with 397 patients.
    Fritz S; Hennig R; Kantas C; Killguss H; Schaudt A; Feilhauer K; Köninger J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 33704562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained?
    Joo JS; Latulippe JF; Alabaz O; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Jun; 41(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 9645742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.