These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15540381)

  • 1. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research ethics boards--operational issues II.
    Maire A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 15540382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethics committees in the United States.
    Capron AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics committees in Asia.
    de Castro LD
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):120-2. PubMed ID: 15282929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On being an IRB.
    Chesapeake Research Review, Inc.
    IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):12-6. PubMed ID: 11653357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the level of statistician participation on Canadian-based research ethics boards.
    Thabane L; Childs A; Lafontaine A
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 15948326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Debate over institutional review boards continues as alternative options emerge.
    McNeil C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Apr; 99(7):502-3. PubMed ID: 17405992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: preparations for HIV vaccine trials.
    Milford C; Wassenaar D; Slack C
    IRB; 2006; 28(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Inefficient, arbitrary, inconsistent": a frank look at how some investigators view IRBs and a few suggestions for improvement.
    Hohmann E; Woodson J
    Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):12-4. PubMed ID: 16317859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
    Mielke J; Ndebele P
    Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community vs. enclave: the moral voice of community can be reflected in IRB composition.
    Taylor C
    Prot Hum Subj; 2002; (7):6. PubMed ID: 12737181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximizing the effectiveness of REBs.
    Fuks A; Beauvais C
    NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 15468467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.