These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15540382)

  • 21. Research ethics boards: size, not money.
    Hill J
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e457; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On being an IRB.
    Chesapeake Research Review, Inc.
    IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):12-6. PubMed ID: 11653357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The need to understand IRB deliberations.
    Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What IRBs could learn from corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    IRB; 2005; 27(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 16425474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research, ethics committees and legal issues.
    Moore A
    N Z Bioeth J; 2003 Oct; 4(3):8-15. PubMed ID: 15597476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?
    Koski G; Aungst J; Kupersmith J; Getz K; Rimoin D
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 16021793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Debate over institutional review boards continues as alternative options emerge.
    McNeil C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Apr; 99(7):502-3. PubMed ID: 17405992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spate of suspensions of academic research spurs questions about federal strategy: a U.S. agency, its own future uncertain, unsettles college officials with its crackdown.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2000 Feb; 96(22):A29-30, A32. PubMed ID: 15744907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In court: research subjects says institutional review boards (IRBs) must change research review.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):8. PubMed ID: 16789307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reducing the burden on many institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Noninstitutional commercial review boards in North America: a critical appraisal and comparison with IRBs.
    Lemmens T; Thompson A
    IRB; 2001; 23(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 12825562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternatives to local institutional review board (IRB) system debated.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 16832918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "Inefficient, arbitrary, inconsistent": a frank look at how some investigators view IRBs and a few suggestions for improvement.
    Hohmann E; Woodson J
    Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):12-4. PubMed ID: 16317859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Searching for effectiveness: the functioning of Connecticut Clinical Ethics Committees.
    Berchelmann K; Blechner B
    J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 12448188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The long arm of administrative law: applying administrative law principles to research ethics boards.
    Hadskis M; Carver P
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):19-32. PubMed ID: 16459411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
    Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research ethics and the "fieldwork monitoring committee".
    Herrera C
    IRB; 2000; 22(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 11883484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.