1236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15540749)
1. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Holmium:YAG Lasertripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscope for upper-ureteral stones >2 cm.
Chen CS; Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY
J Endourol; 2005 Sep; 19(7):780-4. PubMed ID: 16190827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.
Dell'Atti L; Papa S
G Chir; 2016; 37(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27142822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy.
Khalil M
Urol Ann; 2013 Apr; 5(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 23798864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope. Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load?
Cheung MC; Lee F; Yip SK; Tam PC
Eur Urol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 11464061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To Evaluate the Impact of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Removal of Proximal and Distal Ureter Calculi.
Sharma S; Sabale V; Satav V; Mulay A
Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47498. PubMed ID: 38022108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
