1279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541081)
1. Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.
Blum A; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Schwabe R; Rassner G; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1029-38. PubMed ID: 15541081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas.
Annessi G; Bono R; Sampogna F; Faraggiana T; Abeni D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 May; 56(5):759-67. PubMed ID: 17316894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma.
Menzies SW; Bischof L; Talbot H; Gutenev A; Avramidis M; Wong L; Lo SK; Mackellar G; Skladnev V; McCarthy W; Kelly J; Cranney B; Lye P; Rabinovitz H; Oliviero M; Blum A; Varol A; De'Ambrosis B; McCleod R; Koga H; Grin C; Braun R; Johr R
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 141(11):1388-96. PubMed ID: 16301386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.
Dolianitis C; Kelly J; Wolfe R; Simpson P
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):1008-14. PubMed ID: 16103330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simple digital image processing system to aid in melanoma diagnosis in an everyday melanocytic skin lesion unit: a preliminary report.
Manousaki AG; Manios AG; Tsompanaki EI; Panayiotides JG; Tsiftsis DD; Kostaki AK; Tosca AD
Int J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16650167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Asymmetry in dermoscopic melanocytic lesion images: a computer description based on colour distribution.
Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Grana C
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 16648914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma.
Skvara H; Teban L; Fiebiger M; Binder M; Kittler H
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15724011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Algorithmic reproduction of asymmetry and border cut-off parameters according to the ABCD rule for dermoscopy.
Pellacani G; Grana C; Seidenari S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2006 Nov; 20(10):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17062034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis.
Blum A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Steins A; Roehm S; Garbe C; Soyer HP
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 Nov; 18(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 15482291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colour clusters for computer diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.
Seidenari S; Grana C; Pellacani G
Dermatology; 2007; 214(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 17341863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy.
Bauer J; Blum A; Strohhäcker U; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 152(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 15656806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical selection of melanocytic lesions for dermoscopy decreases the identification of suspicious lesions in comparison with dermoscopy without clinical preselection.
Seidenari S; Longo C; Giusti F; Pellacani G
Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 16634889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can automated dermoscopy image analysis instruments provide added benefit for the dermatologist? A study comparing the results of three systems.
Perrinaud A; Gaide O; French LE; Saurat JH; Marghoob AA; Braun RP
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 157(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 17854361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dermoscopy of skin lesions in two patients with xeroderma pigmentosum.
Malvehy J; Puig S; Martí-Laborda RM
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 152(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 15727638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of eccentric and central hyperpigmentation, multifocal hyper/hypopigmentation, and the multicomponent pattern in melanocytic lesions lacking specific dermoscopic features of melanoma.
Arevalo A; Altamura D; Avramidis M; Blum A; Menzies S
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 144(11):1440-4. PubMed ID: 19015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the 'dermoscopy era': a retrospective study 1997-2001.
Carli P; De Giorgi V; Crocetti E; Mannone F; Massi D; Chiarugi A; Giannotti B
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 150(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15099364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidermolysis bullosa naevi reveal a distinctive dermoscopic pattern.
Lanschuetzer CM; Emberger M; Laimer M; Diem A; Bauer JW; Soyer HP; Hintner H
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 153(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 16029333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-diagnostic digital imaging prediction model to discriminate between malignant melanoma and benign pigmented skin lesion.
Christensen JH; Soerensen MB; Linghui Z; Chen S; Jensen MO
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 20384888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-resolution ultrasound reflex transmission imaging and digital photography: potential tools for the quantitative assessment of pigmented lesions.
Rallan D; Dickson M; Bush NL; Harland CC; Mortimer P; Bamber JC
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16420539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital computer analysis of dermatoscopical images of 260 melanocytic skin lesions; perimeter/area ratio for the differentiation between malignant melanomas and melanocytic nevi.
Fikrle T; Pizinger K
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 17207167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
