These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541242)

  • 21. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What is your opinion on the "medical ethics of medical journal editors"?
    Phaosavasdi S; Taneepanichskul S; Tannirandorn Y; Thamkhantho M; Prugsapong C; Phupong V; Karnjanapitak A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Aug; 88(8):1163-4. PubMed ID: 16404851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Helping nurses avoid some pitfalls on the path to publication.
    Gilmour J; Panapa S; Russell A
    Nurs N Z; 2007 Feb; 13(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 17380702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):549. PubMed ID: 15800585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Ethics in articles published in medical journals].
    Reyes H; Palma J; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 2007 Apr; 135(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 17554464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Lancet's editor Dr. Faith McLellan on publication ethics.
    Vucković-Dekić L
    J BUON; 2006; 11(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 17333582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Focus on the funding and production of evidence rather than its publication.
    Sheldon T
    PLoS Med; 2005 Jul; 2(7):e222. PubMed ID: 16033316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Contact to the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty is the logical step].
    Jensen IS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Apr; 171(15):1308; author reply 1308. PubMed ID: 19422162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Problems and conflicts in peer review.
    Kohn A; Putterman C
    Int J Impot Res; 1993 Sep; 5(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 8124431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Full disclosure matters!
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1017. PubMed ID: 18292458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing clinical trial results.
    Veitch E
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5772):365-6; author reply 365-6. PubMed ID: 16634139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Editorial peer review in biomedical publishing: an overview.
    Napolitani Cheyne F
    Rom J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 13(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15229782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity.
    Friedman L; Richter ED
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2005; 11(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 15875898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Painful publishing.
    Raff M; Johnson A; Walter P
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5885):36. PubMed ID: 18599755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What authors need to know about the way editors think: report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
    Neale AV
    Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 11874024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.