These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
30. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Leber AW; Knez A; von Ziegler F; Becker A; Nikolaou K; Paul S; Wintersperger B; Reiser M; Becker CR; Steinbeck G; Boekstegers P J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 15992649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Caussin C; Larchez C; Ghostine S; Pesenti-Rossi D; Daoud B; Habis M; Sigal-Cinqualbre A; Perrier E; Angel CY; Lancelin B; Paul JF Am J Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 98(7):871-6. PubMed ID: 16996865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Achenbach S; Moselewski F; Ropers D; Ferencik M; Hoffmann U; MacNeill B; Pohle K; Baum U; Anders K; Jang IK; Daniel WG; Brady TJ Circulation; 2004 Jan; 109(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 14691045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Schmid M; Pflederer T; Jang IK; Ropers D; Sei K; Daniel WG; Achenbach S Atherosclerosis; 2008 Mar; 197(1):457-64. PubMed ID: 17727859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endothelial shear stress computed from coronary computed tomography angiography: A direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound. Hakim D; Coskun AU; Maynard C; Pu Z; Rupert D; Cefalo N; Cormier M; Ahmed M; Earls J; Jennings R; Croce K; Mushtaq S; Andreini D; Conte E; Molony D; Samady H; Min JK; Stone PH J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(3):201-210. PubMed ID: 37076326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of coronary plaques with 64-slice computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound]. Ye HH; Kaneda H; Saito S; Shiono T; Tanaka S; Miyashita Y; Takahashi S; Taketani Y; Domae H Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 35(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 17961433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multidetector-row computed tomography vs. angiography and intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of the diameter of proximal coronary arteries. Sinha AM; Mahnken AH; Borghans A; Krüger S; Koos R; Dedden K; Wildberger JE; Hoffmann R Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16169611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coronary artery calcium: 0.5 mm slice-thickness reconstruction with adjusted attenuation threshold outperforms 3.0 mm by validating against spatially registered intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter. Qian Z; Dhungel A; Vazquez G; Weeks M; Voros S; Rinehart S Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1128-37. PubMed ID: 26036721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Pflederer T; Schmid M; Ropers D; Ropers U; Komatsu S; Daniel WG; Achenbach S Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):953-7. PubMed ID: 17492542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification. Boogers MJ; Broersen A; van Velzen JE; de Graaf FR; El-Naggar HM; Kitslaar PH; Dijkstra J; Delgado V; Boersma E; de Roos A; Schuijf JD; Schalij MJ; Reiber JH; Bax JJ; Jukema JW Eur Heart J; 2012 Apr; 33(8):1007-16. PubMed ID: 22285583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound. He Y; Zhang Z; Dai Q; Zhou Y; Yang Y; Yu W; An J; Jin L; Jerecic R; Yuan C; Li D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 35(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 21989946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]