These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1554161)

  • 1. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type.
    Martone VD; Enlow DH; Hans MG; Broadbent BH; Oyen O
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):35-42; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 1554161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial form in class III cases.
    Mackay F; Jones JA; Thompson R; Simpson W
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 1562574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
    Dibbets JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia.
    Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns.
    El H; Palomo JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e511-21. PubMed ID: 21640863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial variations related to headform type.
    Bhat M; Enlow DH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3865565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in 7- to 8-year-old children--a 3D evaluation.
    Krneta B; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 25336564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.
    Premkumar S; Gurumurthy B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):582-5. PubMed ID: 24309331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphologic variability of nonsyndromic operated patients affected by cleft lip and palate: a geometric morphometric study.
    Toro-Ibacache V; Cortés Araya J; Díaz Muñoz A; Manríquez Soto G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 25172257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel method of 3-dimensional soft-tissue analysis for Class III patients.
    Božič M; Kau CH; Richmond S; Ovsenik M; Hren NI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):758-69. PubMed ID: 21130335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phenotypic characterization of Class III patients.
    Bui C; King T; Proffit W; Frazier-Bowers S
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 16808560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.