658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541670)
21. Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.
Panjabi M; Malcolmson G; Teng E; Tominaga Y; Henderson G; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):959-66; discussion 967. PubMed ID: 17450069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions.
Brown T; Bao QB; Agrawal CM; Hallab NJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1675-85. PubMed ID: 21494194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Rouleau JP; Carlson CS; Goffin J
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):303S-309S. PubMed ID: 15541681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Topical high-molecular-weight hyaluronan and a roofing barrier sheet equally inhibit postlaminectomy fibrosis.
Akeson WH; Massie JB; Huang B; Giurea A; Sah R; Garfin SR; Kim CW
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 15749618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of total disc arthroplasty: a canine model.
Taylor BA; Okubadejo GO; Patel AA; Talcott MR; Imamura T; Hu N; Cunningham BW
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Apr; 37(4):E64-70. PubMed ID: 18535683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the biological response of wear debris.
Chang BS; Brown PR; Sieber A; Valdevit A; Tateno K; Kostuik JP
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):239S-244S. PubMed ID: 15541672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Material considerations for intervertebral disc replacement implants.
Taksali S; Grauer JN; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):231S-238S. PubMed ID: 15541671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
