BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541671)

  • 1. Material considerations for intervertebral disc replacement implants.
    Taksali S; Grauer JN; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):231S-238S. PubMed ID: 15541671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty.
    Hallab N; Link HD; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S139-52. PubMed ID: 14560185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
    Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):276S-288S. PubMed ID: 15541677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
    Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement.
    Kurtz SM; MacDonald D; Ianuzzi A; van Ooij A; Isaza J; Ross ER; Regan J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2369-77. PubMed ID: 19789469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AcroFlex design and results.
    Fraser RD; Ross ER; Lowery GL; Freeman BJ; Dolan M
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):245S-251S. PubMed ID: 15541673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. History and evolution of disc replacement.
    Bono CM; Garfin SR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):145S-150S. PubMed ID: 15541659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
    Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design rationale and biomechanics of Maverick Total Disc arthroplasty with early clinical results.
    Mathews HH; Lehuec JC; Friesem T; Zdeblick T; Eisermann L
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):268S-275S. PubMed ID: 15541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty.
    Grupp TM; Meisel HJ; Cotton JA; Schwiesau J; Fritz B; Blömer W; Jansson V
    Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 19815271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement.
    McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):177S-181S. PubMed ID: 15541664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.
    Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Rouleau JP; Carlson CS; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):303S-309S. PubMed ID: 15541681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Prestige cervical disc replacement.
    Traynelis VC
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):310S-314S. PubMed ID: 15541682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
    Anderson PA; Rouleau JP; Bryan VE; Carlson CS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S186-94. PubMed ID: 14560190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.
    Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the biological response of wear debris.
    Chang BS; Brown PR; Sieber A; Valdevit A; Tateno K; Kostuik JP
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):239S-244S. PubMed ID: 15541672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.