These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541675)

  • 1. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
    Zigler JE
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Zigler JE; Burd TA; Vialle EN; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 12902951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: data from two investigational centers.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Hochschuler SH; Blumenthal SL; Fedder IL; Ohnmeiss DD; Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):252S-259S. PubMed ID: 15541674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
    Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between the length of time off work preoperatively and clinical outcome at 24-month follow-up in patients undergoing total disc replacement or fusion.
    Rohan MX; Ohnmeiss DD; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Blumenthal SL; Hochschuler SH; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 18809357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of adverse events on low back surgery outcome: twenty-four-month follow-up results from a Food And Drug Administration investigational device exemptiontrial.
    Ohnmeiss DD; Bodemer W; Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(7):835-8. PubMed ID: 20195215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
    Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of results of total disc replacement in postdiscectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery.
    Leahy M; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Rashbaum RF; Sachs BL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):1690-3; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 18580740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: analysis of one center's twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes.
    Guyer RD; Siddiqui S; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Blumenthal SL; Sachs BL; Hochschuler SH; Rashbaum RF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2566-9. PubMed ID: 18941428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Lumbar I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable screw placement system: 10-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
    Brantigan JW; Neidre A; Toohey JS
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 15541703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.