These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541679)

  • 1. Goals of cervical disc replacement.
    Albert TJ; Eichenbaum MD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):292S-293S. PubMed ID: 15541679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
    Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?
    Hilibrand AS; Robbins M
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. PubMed ID: 15541666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.
    Lee SH; Im YJ; Kim KT; Kim YH; Park WM; Kim K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 21245792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of total disc arthroplasty: a canine model.
    Taylor BA; Okubadejo GO; Patel AA; Talcott MR; Imamura T; Hu N; Cunningham BW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Apr; 37(4):E64-70. PubMed ID: 18535683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.
    Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disc arthroplasty: over three years follow-up cohort study.
    Tian W; Han X; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; He D; Xing YG
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(21):2969-73. PubMed ID: 21162939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical results of charité lumbar total disc replacement.
    Regan JJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):323-40. PubMed ID: 15950692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
    Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Prestige cervical disc.
    Traynelis VC
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):621-8, vi. PubMed ID: 16326285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: a review.
    Bartels RH; Donk RD; Pavlov P; van Limbeek J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2008 Dec; 110(10):963-7. PubMed ID: 18639974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of lumbar arthroplasty.
    Crawford NR
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):595-602, v. PubMed ID: 16326282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation.
    Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 18404108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidirectional flexibility of the spine following posterior decompressive surgery after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
    Kikkawa J; Cunningham BW; Shirado O; Hu N; McAfee PC; Oda H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(25):E1465-71. PubMed ID: 21102274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.