These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541685)
1. New developments in nucleus pulposus replacement technology. Carl A; Ledet E; Yuan H; Sharan A Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):325S-329S. PubMed ID: 15541685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. History and evolution of disc replacement. Bono CM; Garfin SR Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):145S-150S. PubMed ID: 15541659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial disc replacement: the new solution for discogenic low back pain? Shuff C; An HS Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2005 Jan; 34(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 15707133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The mid- or long-term clinical results of prosthetic disc nucleus replacement in the treatment of lumbar disc disease]. Ma YZ; Xue HB; Chen X; Guo LX; Li HW; Liu HR Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 18785530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial disc replacement: progress or hype? An HS Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):405. PubMed ID: 17036774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of prosthetic nucleus pulposus replacement on stress distributions of lumbar disc endplate]. Qu DB; Zhao L; Jin DD Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 18785531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease: need for alternative treatment approach of disc arthroplasty? Lee CK; Langrana NA Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):173S-176S. PubMed ID: 15541663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chronic low back pain: the failure of organic medicine]. van Gijn J; van der Mast RC Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jul; 151(28):1553-6. PubMed ID: 17715761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Complains after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain]. van Duppen D Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(39):2181-2; author reply 2182. PubMed ID: 17960706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Alloplasty. Development of well-functioning and durable joint implant--a biomechanical and biological challenge]. Sneppen O; Søballe K Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jan; 162(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 10658504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]