These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15541803)

  • 1. Proximate sources of bacteria on boneless loins prepared from routinely processed and detained carcasses at a pork packing plant.
    Gill CO; Landers C
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 97(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 15541803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.
    Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Youssef MK; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction to trace the fate of generic Escherichia coli within a high capacity pork slaughter line.
    Namvar A; Warriner K
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16386814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genotypic analysis of Escherichia coli recovered from product and equipment at a beef-packing plant.
    Aslam M; Greer GG; Nattress FM; Gill CO; McMullen LM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 15186444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of inadequately cleaned equipment used in a sheep carcass-breaking process.
    Gill CO; Baker LP; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 1999 Jun; 62(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 10382653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological conditions of mechanically tenderized beef cuts prepared at four retail stores.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 95(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15240079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of peroxyacetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite or lactic acid solutions on the microflora of chilled beef carcasses.
    Gill CO; Badoni M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Feb; 91(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 14967559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of spray-cooling processes on the microbiological conditions of decontaminated beef carcasses.
    Gill CO; Landers C
    J Food Prot; 2003 Jul; 66(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 12870760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the adequacy of cleaning of equipment used for breaking beef carcasses.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10050680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Tran F; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2015 Feb; 78(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 25710139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the hygienic performances of the processes for cleaning, dressing and cooling pig carcasses at eight packing plants.
    Gill CO; Dussault F; Holley RA; Houde A; Jones T; Rheault N; Rosales A; Quessy S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 58(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 10898463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contamination of beef chucks with Escherichia coli during carcass breaking.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC; Bryant J
    J Food Prot; 2001 Nov; 64(11):1824-7. PubMed ID: 11726167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbial profiles of carcasses and minced meat from kangaroos processed in South Australia.
    Holds G; Pointon A; Lorimer M; Kiermeier A; Raven G; Sumner J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):88-92. PubMed ID: 18234385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the microbiological conditions of tails, tongues, and head meats at two beef-packing plants.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 1999 Jun; 62(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 10382660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the hygienic performances of the processes for beef carcass dressing at 10 packing plants.
    Gill CO; Deslandes B; Rahn K; Houde A; Bryant J
    J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 84(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 9717290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects on the microbiological condition of product of decontaminating treatments routinely applied to carcasses at beef packing plants.
    Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2009 Aug; 72(8):1790-801. PubMed ID: 19722420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Salmonella surveillance and control at post-harvest in the Belgian pork meat chain.
    Delhalle L; Saegerman C; Farnir F; Korsak N; Maes D; Messens W; De Sadeleer L; De Zutter L; Daube G
    Food Microbiol; 2009 May; 26(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19269567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.