These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543467)

  • 1. Comparative study between patellar-tendon-bearing and pressure cast prosthetic sockets.
    Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 May; 41(3B):491-501. PubMed ID: 15543467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static and dynamic pressure profiles of a patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket.
    Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12666779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stump/socket pressure profiles of the pressure cast prosthetic socket.
    Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2003 Mar; 18(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 12620787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape in a Developing Country: A study to compare initial outcomes in Pressure Cast hydrostatic and Patella Tendon Bearing designs.
    Laing S; Lythgo N; Lavranos J; Lee PVS
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():363-368. PubMed ID: 28869901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation.
    Fergason J; Smith DG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):76-84. PubMed ID: 10212599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interface pressure profile analysis for patellar tendon-bearing socket and hydrostatic socket.
    Moo EK; Osman NA; Pingguan-Murphy B; Abas WA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 20405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
    Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes.
    Safari MR; Meier MR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):491-508. PubMed ID: 26436666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
    Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs.
    Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
    Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcome and cost efficiency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in transtibial amputees.
    Selles RW; Janssens PJ; Jongenengel CD; Bussmann JB
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 86(1):154-61; quiz 180. PubMed ID: 15641007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation.
    Sanders JE; Lam D; Dralle AJ; Okumura R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jan; 34(1):19-43. PubMed ID: 9021623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socket Interface Pressure and Amputee Reported Outcomes for Comfortable and Uncomfortable Conditions of Patellar Tendon Bearing Socket: A Pilot Study.
    Safari MR; Tafti N; Aminian G
    Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):24-31; quiz 32-3. PubMed ID: 26132222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does activity affect residual limb skin temperatures?
    Klute GK; Huff E; Ledoux WR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3062-7. PubMed ID: 24964887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans-tibial stump with a prosthesis.
    Zhang M; Turner-Smith AR; Tanner A; Roberts VC
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Apr; 20(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 9690489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.