These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543781)

  • 41. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development and clinical evaluation of an ionization chamber array with 3.5 mm pixel pitch for quality assurance in advanced radiotherapy techniques.
    Togno M; Wilkens JJ; Menichelli D; Oechsner M; Perez-Andujar A; Morin O
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2283. PubMed ID: 27147340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantifying the effect of anode surface roughness on diagnostic x-ray spectra using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Mehranian A; Ay MR; Alam NR; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):742-52. PubMed ID: 20229884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characterisation of neutron fields around high-energy x-ray radiotherapy machines.
    Králík M; Turek K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15353699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Monte Carlo simulation of the effects of anode surface roughness on x-ray spectra.
    Kákonyi R; Erdélyi M; Szabó G
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5737-45. PubMed ID: 21158285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measurement of X-ray spectra using a Lu2(SiO4)O-multipixel-photon detector with changes in the pixel number.
    Yamaguchi S; Sato E; Oda Y; Nakamura R; Oikawa H; Yabuushi T; Ariga H; Ehara S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Sep; 103():25-30. PubMed ID: 26046520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quality assurance and quality control methodologies used within the Austrian UV monitoring network.
    Mario B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):359-62. PubMed ID: 15550702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The performance of commercial photodiodes for dosimetry in mammography.
    Batista E; Khoury HJ; Melo FA; Barros V; da Silva EF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):391-3. PubMed ID: 16381752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Simple dose rate measurements for a very high synchrotron X-ray flux.
    Liu CJ; Wang CH; Wang CL; Hwu Y; Lin CY; Margaritondo G
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2009 May; 16(Pt 3):395-7. PubMed ID: 19395805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A CdZnTe slot-scanned detector for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Ford NL; Yin S; Gordon EE; Hamilton WJ; Tümer TO; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2767-81. PubMed ID: 12512710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Fewell TR; Shuping RE
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 663212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Huq MS
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2959-68. PubMed ID: 14655943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [The leakage radiation testing method for mammographic X-ray equipments].
    Xia LJ; Wang JJ; Dupont B; Chen J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16830808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for multileaf collimator quality control and calibration.
    Baker SJ; Budgell GJ; MacKay RI
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1377-92. PubMed ID: 15798330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The ENEA criticality accident dosimetry system: a contribution to the 2002 international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor.
    Gualdrini G; Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Mariotti F;
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15353692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.