These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543789)

  • 1. Influence of x-ray pulse parameters on the image quality for moving objects in digital cardiac imaging.
    Guibelalde E; Vano E; Vaquero F; González L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2819-25. PubMed ID: 15543789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automatic nonrigid registration-based local motion estimation for motion-corrected iterative cardiac CT reconstruction.
    Isola AA; Grass M; Niessen WJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1093-109. PubMed ID: 20384245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Ferro F; Contento G; Fornasin F; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1387-407. PubMed ID: 17301461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study.
    Farshad-Amacker NA; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):1234-9. PubMed ID: 24029055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Campayo JM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3. PubMed ID: 16604712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies.
    Tang J; Hsieh J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4377-88. PubMed ID: 20879597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of motion velocity on four-dimensional target volumes: a phantom study.
    Nakamura M; Narita Y; Sawada A; Matsugi K; Nakata M; Matsuo Y; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1610-7. PubMed ID: 19544777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A flexible patch based approach for combined denoising and contrast enhancement of digital X-ray images.
    Irrera P; Bloch I; Delplanque M
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Feb; 28():33-45. PubMed ID: 26716719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How should low-contrast detail detectability be measured in fluoroscopy?
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2564-76. PubMed ID: 15487739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-delayed summation as a means of improving resolution on fast rotating computed tomography systems.
    Nowak T; Hupfer M; Althoff F; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Steiding C; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22482646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.