BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

668 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543797)

  • 1. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A heuristic approach to automated nipple detection in digital mammograms.
    Jas M; Mukhopadhyay S; Chakraborty J; Sadhu A; Khandelwal N
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):932-40. PubMed ID: 23423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.
    Wu YT; Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Daly CP; Douglas JA; Zhang Y; Sahiner B; Shi J; Wei J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 20175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri FF; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):948-57. PubMed ID: 23508373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
    van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Radiomic feature-based Nipple Detection Algorithm on Digital Mammography.
    Jiang J; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Guo Y; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4381-4391. PubMed ID: 31242321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
    Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.