451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543908)
41. Effect of different all-ceramic crown system on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with and without glass fiber posts.
Salameh Z; Sorrentino R; Ounsi HF; Goracci C; Tashkandi E; Tay FR; Ferrari M
J Endod; 2007 Jul; 33(7):848-51. PubMed ID: 17804327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems.
Hu YH; Pang LC; Hsu CC; Lau YH
Quintessence Int; 2003 May; 34(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 12795353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Survival rate of endodontically treated teeth in relation to conservative vs post insertion techniques -- a retrospective study.
Willershausen B; Tekyatan H; Krummenauer F; Briseño Marroquin B
Eur J Med Res; 2005 May; 10(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 15946921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars.
Fokkinga WA; Le Bell AM; Kreulen CM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
Int Endod J; 2005 Apr; 38(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 15810973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
McLaren JD; McLaren CI; Yaman P; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Dennison JD; McDonald NJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 19231569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
Skupien JA; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Kreulen CM; Huysmans MC; Pereira-Cenci T
J Dent; 2016 May; 48():34-9. PubMed ID: 26976553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems.
Maccari PC; Cosme DC; Oshima HM; Burnett LH; Shinkai RS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):30-6; discussion 37. PubMed ID: 17244147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems.
Heydecke G; Butz F; Hussein A; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 12011861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core.
Kwiatkowski S; Geller W
Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2688667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A short-term clinical evaluation of IPS Empress 2 crowns.
Toksavul S; Toman M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 17455438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores.
Gómez-Polo M; Llidó B; Rivero A; Del Río J; Celemín A
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):916-20. PubMed ID: 20713117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An up to 3-Year Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Glass Fiber Posts and Composite Cores with Gold Alloy-Based Posts and Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Zicari F; Van Meerbeek B; Debels E; Lesaffre E; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21716975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns.
Murgueitio R; Bernal G
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 22372380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs.
Ozcan M; Niedermeier W
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 12066495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts.
Mannocci F; Ferrari M; Watson TF
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 11725680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts--a prospective study.
Glazer B
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Dec; 66(11):613-8. PubMed ID: 11253354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up.
Sarkis-Onofre R; Jacinto RC; Boscato N; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 24530920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
