651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543909)
1. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.
Albert FE; El-Mowafy OM
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 15543909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precision of marginal adaptation of the incisor and molar Procera allceram crown copings.
Pilathadka S; Slezák R; Srinivasan V; Ivancáková R
Prague Med Rep; 2008; 109(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 19097392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of load at fracture of Procera AllCeram copings using different luting cements.
Al-Makramani BMA; Razak AAA; Abu-Hassan MI
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 18047490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of single crowns retained with resin-modified glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate luting cements.
Jokstad A
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 15382776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
Etman MK; Woolford MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A comparative study of marginal microleakage using different cements in porcelain-fused-to-metal crown].
Jiang MX; Huang KQ; Li ZG; Gao XQ; Li CS
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 21598490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a pressure chamber to compare microleakage of three luting agents.
Lyons KM; Rodda JC; Hood JA
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 9495161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.
Sorrentino R; Galasso L; Tetè S; De Simone G; Zarone F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 20030675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.
Quintas AF; Oliveira F; Bottino MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 15343160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
