These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543909)

  • 1. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.
    Albert FE; El-Mowafy OM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 15543909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
    Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of marginal adaptation of the incisor and molar Procera allceram crown copings.
    Pilathadka S; Slezák R; Srinivasan V; Ivancáková R
    Prague Med Rep; 2008; 109(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 19097392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of load at fracture of Procera AllCeram copings using different luting cements.
    Al-Makramani BMA; Razak AAA; Abu-Hassan MI
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 18047490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of single crowns retained with resin-modified glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate luting cements.
    Jokstad A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 15382776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
    Etman MK; Woolford MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparative study of marginal microleakage using different cements in porcelain-fused-to-metal crown].
    Jiang MX; Huang KQ; Li ZG; Gao XQ; Li CS
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 21598490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a pressure chamber to compare microleakage of three luting agents.
    Lyons KM; Rodda JC; Hood JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 9495161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.
    Sorrentino R; Galasso L; Tetè S; De Simone G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 20030675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.
    Quintas AF; Oliveira F; Bottino MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 15343160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.