These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543910)

  • 1. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them.
    Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15543910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 20209188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration.
    Ellingsen JE; Thomsen P; Lyngstadaas SP
    Periodontol 2000; 2006; 41():136-56. PubMed ID: 16686931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histomorphologic and bone-to-implant contact evaluation of dual acid-etched and bioceramic grit-blasted implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Fernandes CA; Gil JN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1877-83. PubMed ID: 20542367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration.
    Le Guéhennec L; Soueidan A; Layrolle P; Amouriq Y
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):844-54. PubMed ID: 16904738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
    Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.
    Shibli JA; Grassi S; Piattelli A; Pecora GE; Ferrari DS; Onuma T; d'Avila S; Coelho PG; Barros R; Iezzi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 19438956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of drilling technique on the early integration of plateau root form endosteal implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2158-63. PubMed ID: 21530048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.