These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543910)

  • 21. Hard tissue implant interface.
    Albrektsson T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S34-8. PubMed ID: 18498583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():172-84. PubMed ID: 19663964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
    Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osseointegration--the influence of implant surface.
    Ivanovski S
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2010 Mar; 20():82-5. PubMed ID: 22046744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Moderately roughened- and roughened-surface implants used as rigid orthodontic anchorage: a case series.
    Kato S; Kato M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16774594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
    Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical and bone histomorphologic evaluation of four surfaces on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Janal MN; Suzuki M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e39-45. PubMed ID: 20416517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
    Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What physical and/or biochemical characteristics of roughened endosseous implant surfaces particularly enhance their bone-implant contact capability?
    Cooper LF; Deporter D; Wennerberg A; Hämmerle C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 15839126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces.
    Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):544-64. PubMed ID: 15543911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model.
    Choi JY; Lee HJ; Jang JU; Yeo IS
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22382750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term effects of magnetron-sputtered calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of dental implants in non-human primates.
    Fügl A; Ulm C; Tangl S; Vasak C; Gruber R; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19191794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep.
    Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
    Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants.
    Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20116717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography.
    Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Aragão FJ; Cooper LF
    Biomaterials; 2008 Oct; 29(28):3822-35. PubMed ID: 18617258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.