476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15543917)
1. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative evaluation of the shrinkage of addition-type silicone impression material using hand-mix and cartridge-mix technique].
Lampé I; Hegedús C
Fogorv Sz; 2002 Dec; 95(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12629833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extrusion-mixing compared with hand-mixing of polyether impression materials?
McMahon C; Kinsella D; Fleming GJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Dec; 18(4):150-4. PubMed ID: 21265432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
Kugel G; Swift EJ; Sorensen JA; Tucker JH; Dunne JT
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material.
Nam J; Raigrodski AJ; Townsend J; Lepe X; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of water quality on setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
Bradna P; Cerna D
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 17174662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
