301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15544147)
1. The banking of embryonic stem cells: the legal and ethical framework in the UK.
Richarson G
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2004; (20):147-60. PubMed ID: 15544147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryo research.
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Jan; (184):6. PubMed ID: 14983850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The UK model: setting the standard for embryonic stem cell research?
Herder M
Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 15739306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
MacKellar C
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond the HFE Act of 1990: the regulation of stem cell research in the UK.
Plomer A
Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 14982080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Britain embraces embryonic stem cell research.
Rosenthal E
N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():F6. PubMed ID: 15540362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Great Britain
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cell research: the laws of nations and a proposal for international guidelines.
Ayer AC
Conn J Int Law; 2002; 17(2):393-428. PubMed ID: 12688299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cell nuclear replacement is regulated by Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Mar; (186):13-5. PubMed ID: 14983857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cloning human embryos for spare tissue: an ethical dilemma.
Bruce D
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12731560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
Brownsword R
Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stem cell division: abortion law and its influence on the adoption of radically different embryonic stem cell legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Belew KL
Tex Int Law J; 2004; 39(3):479-519. PubMed ID: 16514771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal and ethical responsibilities of gamete banks.
Deech R
Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13 Suppl 2():80-3; discussion 84-9. PubMed ID: 9665328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Statutory Storage Period for Embryos) Regulations 1996 (S.I. 1996 No. 375).
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 11655139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Great Britain
Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
Sexton S
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. English lab ready to clone embryos for stem cells.
Hall SS
N Y Times Web; 2004 Oct; ():F2. PubMed ID: 15487064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
Adam D
Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom.
English V
J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):380-1. PubMed ID: 12194465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
