These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15544298)

  • 21. In vivo robotics for natural orifice transgastric peritoneoscopy.
    Lehman AC; Dumpert J; Wood NA; Visty AQ; Farritor SM; Oleynikov D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():236-41. PubMed ID: 18391294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of monoscopic insertable, remotely controlled imaging device with a standard laparoscope in a porcine model.
    Hogle NJ; Hu T; Allen PK; Fowler DL
    Surg Innov; 2008 Dec; 15(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 18945706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying surgeon grasping mechanics in laparoscopy using the Blue DRAGON system.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Chang L; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():34-6. PubMed ID: 15544237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vivo laparoscopic robotics.
    Rentschler ME; Platt SR; Dumpert J; Farritor SM; Oleynikov D
    Int J Surg; 2006; 4(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 17462341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery.
    Lehman AC; Wood NA; Farritor S; Goede MR; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jan; 25(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 20549244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robots in the operating theatre--chances and challenges.
    Korb W; Marmulla R; Raczkowsky J; Mühling J; Hassfeld S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 33(8):721-32. PubMed ID: 15556318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo microrobots for natural orifice transluminal surgery. Current status and future perspectives.
    Forgione A
    Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 18(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 19147345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
    Kenngott HG; Muller-Stich BP; Reiter MA; Rassweiler J; Gutt CN
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18609002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.
    Lehnert M; Richter B; Beyer PA; Heller K
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Aug; 41(8):1392-6. PubMed ID: 16863843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the Da Vinci system: our first experiences.
    Braumann C; Jacobi CA; Menenakos C; Borchert U; Rueckert JC; Mueller JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Sep; 48(9):1820-7. PubMed ID: 16142433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic foregut surgery.
    Ito F; Gould JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 17520645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.
    Dolghi O; Strabala KW; Wortman TD; Goede MR; Farritor SM; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Oct; 25(10):3453-8. PubMed ID: 21487861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Robotic assistance in gynaecological surgery: State-of-the-art].
    Monsarrat N; Collinet P; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Vinatier D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 19398363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Hepatic and pancreatic laparoscopic surgery].
    Pardo F; Rotellar F; Valentí V; Pastor C; Poveda I; Martí-Cruchaga P; Zozaya G
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2005; 28 Suppl 3():51-9. PubMed ID: 16511579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
    Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.
    van Haasteren G; Levine S; Hayes W
    Pediatrics; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1642-9. PubMed ID: 19917586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.