These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15544309)

  • 1. Validation of soft tissue properties in surgical simulation with haptic feedback.
    Sur H; Faraci A; Bello F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():382-4. PubMed ID: 15544309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurement of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Moreyra M; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():71-3. PubMed ID: 15458062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation.
    Tay BK; Stylopoulos N; De S; Rattner DW; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():514-9. PubMed ID: 15458143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized haptic feedback approach for arbitrarily shaped objects.
    Hu R; Barner KE; Steiner KV
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():224-30. PubMed ID: 21335793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Input and output for surgical simulation: devices to measure tissue properties in vivo and a haptic interface for laparoscopy simulators.
    Ottensmeyer MP; Ben-Ur E; Salisbury JK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():236-42. PubMed ID: 10977548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Pseudo-Haptic Interactions with Soft Objects in Virtual Environments.
    Li M; Sareh S; Xu G; Ridzuan MB; Luo S; Xie J; Wurdemann H; Althoefer K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157681. PubMed ID: 27352234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
    Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haptic rendering for VR laparoscopic surgery simulation.
    McColl R; Brown I; Seligman C; Lim F; Alsaraira A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Mar; 29(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 16623225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception.
    Perreault JO; Cao CG
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):574-86. PubMed ID: 17063970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction model between elastic objects for haptic feedback considering collisions of soft tissue.
    Kuroda Y; Nakao M; Kuroda T; Oyama H; Komori M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 16226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual reality in laparoscopic skills training: is haptic feedback replaceable?
    Hiemstra E; Terveer EM; Chmarra MK; Dankelman J; Jansen FW
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2011 May; 20(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 21438717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A one degree of freedom haptic system to investigate issues in human perception with particular application to probing tissue.
    Dibble E; Zivanovic A; Davies B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():69-71. PubMed ID: 15544245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open surgery simulation.
    Bielser D; Gross MH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():57-63. PubMed ID: 15458060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
    Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rupture progression model of stress integration for virtual reality ablation.
    Kume N; Eguchi K; Kuroda T; Yoshimura K; Okubo K; Okamoto K; Takemura T; Yoshihara H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():242-6. PubMed ID: 23400164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Force interactions in laparoscopic simulations: haptic rendering of soft tissues.
    Basdogan C; Ho CH; Srinivasan MA; Small SD; Dawson SL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():385-91. PubMed ID: 10180581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile feedback exceeds visual feedback to display tissue slippage in a laparoscopic grasper.
    Westebring-van der Putten EP; Lysen WW; Henssen VD; Koopmans N; Goossens RH; van den Dobbelsteen JJ; Dankelman J; Jakimowcz J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():420-5. PubMed ID: 19377198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphic and haptic simulation system for virtual laparoscopic rectum surgery.
    Pan JJ; Chang J; Yang X; Zhang JJ; Qureshi T; Howell R; Hickish T
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Sep; 7(3):304-17. PubMed ID: 21563287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bimanual haptic workstation for laparoscopic surgery simulation.
    Devarajan V; Scott D; Jones D; Rege R; Eberhart R; Lindahl C; Tanguy P; Fernandez R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():126-8. PubMed ID: 11317725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.