BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15544317)

  • 1. Increasing face validity of a vascular interventional training system.
    Winder J; Zheng H; Hughes S; Kelly B; Wilson C; Gallagher A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():410-5. PubMed ID: 15544317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ICTS, an interventional cardiology training system.
    Cotin S; Dawson SL; Meglan D; Shaffer DW; Ferrell MA; Bardsley RS; Morgan FM; Nagano T; Nikom J; Sherman P; Walterman MT; Wendlandt J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():59-65. PubMed ID: 10977584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Leyton F; Miranda P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4049-62. PubMed ID: 18612174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time PC based X-ray simulation for interventional radiology training.
    Muniyandi M; Cotin S; Srinivasan M; Dawson S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():233-9. PubMed ID: 15455899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-based simulator for catheter insertion training.
    Aloisio G; Barone L; Bergamasco M; Avizzano CA; De Paolis LT; Franceschini M; Mongelli A; Pantile G; Provenzano L; Raspolli M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():4-6. PubMed ID: 15544228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intelligent training system integrated in an echocardiography simulator.
    Weidenbach M; Trochim S; Kreutter S; Richter C; Berlage T; Grunst G
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Jul; 34(5):407-25. PubMed ID: 15145712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
    Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography.
    Patel AD; Gallagher AG; Nicholson WJ; Cates CU
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(9):1796-802. PubMed ID: 16682303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology systems. A national survey in Chile.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Leyton F; Martinez LC; Oyarzun C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 21148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time interactive simulator for percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.
    Wang Y; Chui C; Lim H; Cai Y; Mak K
    Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(5):211-27. PubMed ID: 10207646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A system for real-time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention.
    Rhode KS; Sermesant M; Brogan D; Hegde S; Hipwell J; Lambiase P; Rosenthal E; Bucknall C; Qureshi SA; Gill JS; Razavi R; Hill DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1428-40. PubMed ID: 16279080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paediatric interventional cardiology: flat detector versus image intensifier using a test object.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Martinez LC; Leyton F; Miranda P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):7287-97. PubMed ID: 21081824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate.
    Månsson LG; Båth M; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 15933125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A surgical simulator for planning and performing repair of cleft lips.
    Schendel S; Montgomery K; Sorokin A; Lionetti G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15975810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
    Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety of percutaneous left heart catheterization directly performed by cardiology fellows: a cohort analysis.
    Agostoni P; Anselmi M; Gasparini G; Morando G; Tosi P; De Benedictis ML; Quintarelli S; Molinari G; Zardini P; Turri M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 18(6):248-52. PubMed ID: 16751676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.