These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15544682)

  • 41. Citizens' juries: the public verdict on antibiotic resistance.
    Burki T
    Lancet Respir Med; 2016 Oct; 4(10):779. PubMed ID: 27567071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Whose health service is it anyway? Community values in healthcare.
    Mooney GH; Blackwell SH
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jan; 180(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 14723590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizens' Jury of young people in South Wales.
    Iredale R; Longley M; Thomas C; Shaw A
    Health Expect; 2006 Sep; 9(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 16911135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Grass-roots reflections on substance abuse. A community dialogue approach.
    Post SG
    Second Opin; 1992 Jul; 18(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 10171090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study.
    De Weger E; Drewes HW; Van Vooren NJE; Luijkx KG; Baan CA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265404. PubMed ID: 35324975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Burton P; Kendall E; Ratcliffe J; Wilson A; Littlejohns P; Scuffham PA
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Jul; 3(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 25114943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food-policy development.
    Timotijevic L; Raats MM
    Health Policy; 2007 Aug; 82(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17067716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing the public acceptability of proposed policy interventions to reduce the misuse of antibiotics in Australia: A report on two community juries.
    Degeling C; Johnson J; Iredell J; Nguyen KA; Norris JM; Turnidge JD; Dawson A; Carter SM; Gilbert GL
    Health Expect; 2018 Feb; 21(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 28665050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Addressing Health Disparities Through Deliberative Methods: Citizens' Panels for Health Equity.
    Subica AM; Brown BJ
    Am J Public Health; 2020 Feb; 110(2):166-173. PubMed ID: 31855474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Citizens' juries for health policy.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2650. PubMed ID: 28576765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.
    Abelson J; Eyles J; McLeod CB; Collins P; McMullan C; Forest PG
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 14499168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Citizens' juries can bring public voices on overdiagnosis into policy making.
    Degeling C; Thomas R; Rychetnik L
    BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l351. PubMed ID: 30700440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Commercial use of health data-A public "trial" by citizens' jury.
    Tully MP; Hassan L; Oswald M; Ainsworth J
    Learn Health Syst; 2019 Oct; 3(4):e10200. PubMed ID: 31641688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Public understandings of potential policy responses to health inequalities: Evidence from a UK national survey and citizens' juries in three UK cities.
    Smith KE; Macintyre AK; Weakley S; Hill SE; Escobar O; Fergie G
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Dec; 291():114458. PubMed ID: 34655938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. People's policies for the health of the poor globally.
    Govender V; Mooney G
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2012; 27(2):e92-103. PubMed ID: 21674620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Community health councils. Another brick in the wall.
    Walsh P
    Health Serv J; 2001 Nov; 111(5779):26-7. PubMed ID: 11706806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Citizens' juries could help to guide screening policy.
    Colombo C; Mosconi P
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3520. PubMed ID: 27354033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prioritizing government funding of adolescent vaccinations: recommendations from young people on a citizens' jury.
    Parrella A; Braunack-Mayer A; Collins J; Clarke M; Tooher R; Ratcliffe J; Marshall H
    Vaccine; 2016 Jun; 34(31):3592-7. PubMed ID: 27195757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.